Tactic 08Sue The Accuser In The Jurisdiction With The Better Court
After four years of Romanian house arrests, jail stints, and cases that kept getting thrown out and rebuilt, Tate arrived at a simple diagnosis: the Romanian system was the weapon, not the arena. The prosecutor had no real evidence, all the women were defending him, and the country itself was rated at the same judicial integrity level as Zambia on the democracy index. Fighting on that ground meant the other side controlled the rules. So he opened a second front somewhere else. He filed a defamation and fraud lawsuit against girl A in Florida, where she lived, in American courts, under American rules of evidence. "We have the lawsuit against girl A in Florida. Where she's from. No Romanian courts. American courts. Not perfect, but it's the best chance we got."
The choice of jurisdiction was not cosmetic. In Romanian proceedings, Tate had no ability to present his evidence, no chance to put girl A on the stand, no mechanism to surface what he says he had: her psychiatric history, her prior accusations against other men including her father, and the $30,000 payment she received from the NGO La Strada three days before she contacted Tristan and flew to Romania. None of that was surfacing in a DIICOT file built to jail him, not to examine her. A Florida civil deposition is a different instrument entirely. It is adversarial, it is public, and it forces the accuser to answer questions on record. That is what the other side spent three years and, by Tate's account, $10 million in legal fees trying to prevent. La Strada funded eleven lawyers to delay, dismiss, and bury the case. When those efforts finally failed, two things happened simultaneously: Tate received a $50 million settlement offer, and the threatening messages started again.
The settlement offer is the tell. Tate had been offered $50 million once before, framed as a sponsorship contract, with the same strings attached: stop talking, change your opinions, disappear. The number was the same. "The number for the sponsorship contract was $50 million across three years. And I've just been offered $50 million if I drop my case, if I don't mention it ever again, and I shut up." He turned it down both times, for the same reason: the money does not change his material life, but it does cancel the one outcome he actually wants, which is girl A on a stand, in public, answering questions on the record, with the NGO funding chain visible to everyone watching.
If you are the target of a false accusation and the local legal system is captured or corrupt, do not fight exclusively on that ground. Identify which jurisdiction gives you the most adversarial discovery rights over your accuser, file a civil claim there, and pursue deposition. The goal of a deposition is not a favorable verdict; it is a public, sworn record that forces the accuser to answer specific questions she has so far avoided. Track who funds her legal defense and file disclosure requests around that funding. The side that most wants the deposition to never happen is the side with the most to lose from the testimony.