Let Admiration Tell You Who You Should Become
Peterson's definition of God is not propositional. It is not a set of facts or a scientific theory. His definition is operational: God is the spirit you must emulate in order to thrive. And the way you identify that spirit is by paying close attention to what grips you against your will. He puts it plainly. When you find someone admirable, you want to be like them. That wanting is not decorative. It is information. Admiration means there is something about the way that person exists that compels imitation. Peterson calls this worship in the most fundamental sense, before any religious overlay is added. Children do it with heroes. Adults do it until they become entirely cynical, which he treats as a pathology, not a sophistication. The practical move is this: imagine taking the full set of people you genuinely admire and extracting, through successive refinement, the central features of what makes them admirable. You do that repeatedly, purifying toward what is most admirable across all of them. That distillation is as close as you can get, he argues, to a representation of what to aim at. It is not a belief system you adopt. It is a direction you notice you are already pointed toward whenever you are paying attention.




